- RECLAIME PRO TOTAL ERRORS HOW TO
- RECLAIME PRO TOTAL ERRORS FULL VERSION
- RECLAIME PRO TOTAL ERRORS SOFTWARE
- RECLAIME PRO TOTAL ERRORS TRIAL
- RECLAIME PRO TOTAL ERRORS WINDOWS 7
One of the frustrating things I found is that most of the sites had steps but didn’t really explain them (so a windows guy could understand at least) I hope that this post avoids that. I’ll also note that what follows is a compilation of bits and pieces for 2 or 3 dozen various linux related websites. You can ask but as noted, I’m not a linux expert. ALSO, when you following along and the output of your system isn’t what I’m saying it should, I’m not sure I can help.
RECLAIME PRO TOTAL ERRORS HOW TO
Search for Clone RAID disk for details on how to do that. Nothing that follows should damage your data but I’m not a linux genius and you might not be either so you might want to image those disks before proceeding.
RECLAIME PRO TOTAL ERRORS WINDOWS 7
This post is about how to mount your RAID5 array in Debian, create an iSCSI target so that Windows 7 can see it and get all of your data back like a superstar.įrom here on this is a AS AT YOUR OWN RISK kind of tutorial.
Get your linux-fu going and try to recover the data yourself. UFS had no idea what to do with that iSCSI data and couldn’t even see it. It also sped up file transfer (which was atrocious even sped up…another reason to avoid the BA series). Using iSCSI allowed me to have a mapped drive letter pointed directly to the BA440 rather than having to deal with a cumbersome webinterface. The 95G of media files were on an iSCSI drive hosted on the BA440. 
RECLAIME PRO TOTAL ERRORS FULL VERSION
Had I just had the basic BA440 setup, I probably would have paid for the full version of UFS and been able to recover most if not all of my data. I was able to open some PDFs and small word docs but can’t verify that it would have worked for all files. The full version (155 Euros) unlocks larger files.
RECLAIME PRO TOTAL ERRORS TRIAL
The trial version only allows viewing/copying of small files.
After a 20 hour scan, I was able to view the file structure and see that it would likely be able to recover many files. Of these, the only one that I tried that seemed to work at all was the UFS Explorer.
UFS Explorer RAID recovery – SysDev Labs. ReclaiMe Raid Recovery/FileRecovery –. RECLAIME PRO TOTAL ERRORS SOFTWARE
Remove the drives, attach them to a windows system and use one of the several NAS recovery software tools. Send your drives to Seagate Data Recovery Services where they will be happy to recover the data for you for $3,000 to $20,000 (plus s&h). And no I did not have a backup of my backup. As several forum posts mention, a RAID5 NAS is –used- as a backup in many, many instances, probably the majority of them. If you’re lucky, your array will be working after a reboot. If you search the Seagate forums you will find 5 basic solutions. I completely agree with the review author’s comment “I have worked in IT for 15 years and I have never come across something quite so stupid.” In other words, this was a huge disaster. A failed disk would have been (theoretically) easy to fix. It’s important to note here that not a SINGLE disk showed to have failed. 95G of media files, 7G of old (but still required) accounting data, 5G of required regulatory documents. It was used as a data warehouse for old files, especially media files. “Contacted support and they said “RAID 5 config stores all parity information on drive 1” So yes if you have an issue with Drive 1, your array is useless.Īs those of you who use RAID5 know, we are supposed to be able to withstand a complete failure of 1 disk and still have complete data integrity. Update: I found this quote on the BA’s Amazon review page. Something in the BA440 RAID software has crapped out and the whole point of RAID is now out the window. The tl dr version is that one day for no apparent reason, your RAID5 array with all your data on it will simply show up as FAILED in the BA440 even if all the disks show no problem. This error message is what led me from irritation, to denial, to despair, to confusion and finally to triumph. Check out the posts in the Seagate Community Forums for “Data Volume Usage Failed status”. Mine consisted of 4 1 TB Seagate drives in a RAID5 array. The Seagate BlackArmor 440 is a RAID Capable SMB NAS.
0 kommentar(er)
